In Uttar Pradesh, three cases related to temples and mosques were heard in the court. The Varanasi court has given a new date for the verdict in the survey case in Gnanavapi Masjid. While the court has canceled the application related to Taj Mahal. So in the Mathura Idgah case, the High Court has ordered the Sessions Court.
Survey controversy in Gnanawapi
First of all, let’s talk about the controversy in Varanasi’s Gnanavapi Masjid. The whole matter is currently in the court, while the other party demanded the removal of the commissioner, but the court has given a new date for the survey inside the mosque. However, the court gave a blow to the other side while delivering an important verdict and refused to remove Advocate Commissioner Ajay Kumar Mishra, who was appointed in the Gnanavapi Masjid survey. Along with this, the court has also ordered Vishal Kumar Singh and Ajay Singh to be made court commissioners in addition to court commissioner Ajay Mishra. Both or either of these will be present during the survey operation.
Also, the court has ordered to complete the survey of Gnanavapi Masjid before May 17. The court has ordered to submit the report on May 17. At the same time, the court also said that legal action will be taken against those who will try to create obstruction in government work.
Anjuman Intjamia Masazid Committee petitioned the court to remove the commissioner. After three days of arguments, the court reserved its verdict.
The court ordered the survey in the Gnanawapi Masjid on a petition filed by 5 women. In which he sought the right to daily worship at Sringar Gauri, after which the court appointed an advocate commissioner. But during the survey there was an uproar in Gyanwapi Masjid and the entire survey work was stopped. Since then the whole matter was in court. The court ordered to complete the survey before May 17.
- What is knowledge dispute?
- 5 women filed an application in the court
- Demanded right to daily worship at Sringar Gauri
- The court appointed an advocate commissioner
- The team reached Gnanawapi Masjid to survey
- In the meantime, the survey work went wrong
- The court ordered to complete the survey before May 17
Some Hindu organizations are also constantly demanding in this matter that azaan can be done anywhere but this temple has historical importance.
Krishnajanmabhoomi controversy
When the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute was resolved, now the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute has come up. The Allahabad High Court gave an important judgment in the case of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi in Mathura. The High Court directed the Mathura court to dispose of all the petitions within 4 months. Also, the High Court has directed to issue a unilateral order on the non-participation of the Sunni Waqf Board and other parties in the hearing. It is important that the High Court pronounced this decision on the application of Manish Yadav. Looking at the whole controversy…
The Taj Mahal Controversy
The court also gave an important verdict on the petition made regarding the demand to open 22 rooms of the Taj Mahal. The Lucknow High Court rejected a plea seeking opening of 22 rooms of the Taj Mahal. The court also scolded the petitioner and said that you should come after reciting history first. Do PhD then come to us.
When the Mughals came to India, they came with a policy of propagating the Muslim religion. It is a reality that they destroy Hindu culture, temples and build mosques. But whether the Taj Mahal is also built on any such religious site is a matter of inquiry.
